Lavender and Ugliness

A friend of mine once said that peace is the lowest standard any society can have. The world I currently know is peaceful; It isn't weed and reggae peaceful, it isn't zen music and lavender peaceful either. We judge the historical timeframe of a place based on its Aesthetics and its existential environment.

I'll use music as an example because that's my main interest. For the previous few decades music was all about finding beauty in the ugliness of the world. Nowadays music is about framing ugly things as beautiful. Modern music videos amount to disjointed sequences of race-mixing and gay guys. Its intentionally inane and dubious when it could be so much more. There is no gumption to the music itself, unless you consider four chords brilliant.

The existential environment has also changed. Ideologues of any variant can agree that most people lack passion; What they blame may change, but its obvious that no one is doing anything past blaming.

Enter tfwnogf. If forever alone seemed pathetic, than this new flavor of the day will annoy you. Try enjoying anything more than a decade old, you'll be plagued with people undergoing a midlife crisis at age 16. 

I'd rather walk into Mordor than live peacefully with Lady Gaga and the 4Chan community. Also, this was going to be a MISTERWONKA7 video, but Youtube had to be problematic. Enjoy my new time schedule. The Atlantic crowd can now enjoy my blogposts at 9:AM, the time they're meant to be seen.

WCW Bash at The Beach 1996 Review

1. Rey Mysterio, Jr vs Psychosis

Before he did the 619 and won World Heavyweight titles, he was the king of the cruiserweights. All his matches with Psychosis are high quality. These two exit the ring a lot in this match, so expect an exciting opener and expect high spots galore.

2. John Tenta vs Big Bubba (with Jimmy Hart)

What's with WCW and its need to stick random gimmicks on a pole?  In this match a sack full of coins is on a pole, and it can be used as a weapon. The contest is settled over a pinfall or submission, meaning that acquiring the sack is optional. I thought this match would be boring, but it made for tolerable and entertaining comic relief. Expect some cartoony heel moves from Big Bubba and Jimmy Hart.

3. Jim Duggan vs Diamond Dallas Page

This started off looking like a one-sided squash match. I totally assumed that Duggan was going to humiliate DDP. DDP does manage to win this bout.

4. The Nasty Boyz vs The Public Enemy

I was drifting in an out of consciousness during this hardcore match. The Nasty Boyz were an innovative tag team during the 80's, but they're too goofy for me. Getting hit with an inanimate steel object should make me cringe, not induce slapstick comedy.   

5. Dean Malenko (c) vs Disco Inferno for The WCW World Cruiserweight Championship

This is a face vs face confrontation. Without a doubt this is Disco Inferno's best match. The contrast between both wrestlers personalities and styles is complementary. Malenko can work a great match with anybody thanks to his stoic personality and technical wrestling abilities. Disco Inferno gets the advantage a few times and does a good job for the most part to avoid his goofy habits.

6. Joe Gomez vs Steve McMichael (with Queen Debra)

Steve wins with a tombstone piledriver. This match rekindled my sleepiness; thus making the excitement of the previous match all for nought. I appreciate the fact that this match is short, because nothing memorable happened.

7. Konnan (c) vs Ric Flair (with Woman and Miss Elizabeth) for The WCW United States Championship

I find it strange that both wrestlers are still alive as of this day, yet the female valets aren't. This was when Ric Flair hopped back into the midcard hoping to make the transition back into the world title scene. Konnan is a beast in the ring, and Ric Flair can tell a great story given the right guy. Towards the end the ring valets played an integral role in the match. Elizabeth played the passive valet who would distract the referee, while Woman was aggressive and would attack Konnan.

8. Chris Benoit and Arn Anderson vs The Giant and The Taskmaster.

I dislike anything with WCW's Kevin Sullivan in it. He sucks. 

9. Randy Savage, Sting, and Lex Luger vs The Outsiders (Kevin Nash and Scott Hall) and Hulk Hogan

The third man in the mysterious hostile takeover didn't show up yet for most of the match. Obviously for you, you know that it's Hogan, but for everybody else they never saw it coming. It starts off as a handicap match with the heels battling the faces and doing a pretty good job. After a while it seems that the heels are just drawing out time, then Hogan comes to "Save The Day"; What he does instead is hit Randy Savage with a legdrop. We are then treated to the coolest interview sequence with Hulk Hogan and Gene Okerlund. It was the most surprising heel turn at the time, yet looking back it seemed so necessary.

This will be my last WCW ppv review in a while. I need to mix it up.

WCW Bash at The Beach 1994 Review

1. Johnny B Badd vs Lord Steven Regal (C) for The WCW World Television Championship.

Johnny B Badd was always a strange character: He can make any other flamboyant wrestler look manly, and he relies on his boxing background to beat his opponents. Lots of people in The IWC look at Steven Regal like he's some kind of underrated gem, and I never found out why. Now I realize that he can work an engaging match with anybody. I'm not knocking on B Badd. 

Prior to watching this, I didn't know that B Badd was a replacement for Sting. Those are some big shoes to fill, and I commend him for putting up a fantastic opening match.

2. The Guardian Angel vs Vader (with Harley Race).

The match itself was so-so, but the finish was well done. The Guardian Angel was holding a weapon that Vader or Race was going to use against him while the ref was down. The Angel wasn't going to use it on Vader, but the referee disqualifies The Guardian Angel upon getting up. This was a great way to get heat on both Vader and Race. We all knew that The Guardian Angel was too much of a goodie two shoes to actually use it, but the ref acted on his own judgement when he made the call.

3. Dustin Rhodes and Arn Anderson vs Terry Funk and Bunkhouse Bunk.

This match really established Dustin Rhodes as the underdog. He was a rookie at the time in a feud with a bitter family rival. The Funks and The Rhodes family had a past together. The first half of the match featuring Funk and Bunk torturing Dustin Rhodes, while the latter half featuring Rhodes taking on both of them at the same time with finesse. For a while it seemed like Rhodes was taking too long to tag Anderson, but as soon as he gets the tag in, Anderson attacks his own partner with the DDT and let's Funk get the pinfall.

All three of them proceed to systematically attack Dustin Rhodes, targeting his arm in the beatdown. It was a brilliant way to get heat on Terry Funk and to get Dusty over as a babyface. They all proceed to celebrate with Champagne and Hookers, The WCW way.

4. Ricky "The Dragon" Steamboat vs Stunning Steve Austin (C) For The WCW United States Championship.

Steamboat (allegedly) never had a bad match, while Austin was still a technically sound wrestler at the time. These two put on the match of the night. Austin does every cheap, underhanded thing to get the victory or keep the title, while Steamboat lays it all on the line to win the title.

5. Cactus Jack and Kevin Sullivan vs Pretty Wonderful (Paul Roma and Paul Orndorff) (C) For The WCW World Tag Team Championships.

I didn't really care for this match. Most of the matches in this ppv felt longer than they actually were, but in this case this match actually had some hangtime to it. Paul Orndorff's weird elbow drop and Spike Piledriver were the saving graces of this match.

6. Hulk Hogan (with Mr T and Jimmy Hart) vs Ric Flair (With Sensuous Sherri) for The WCW World Heavyweight Championship:

I knew going in to this match that it wouldn't be all that. Vince tried out Hogan vs Flair in a few house shows prior and realized that the matches weren't all that. This was the first time a large mass of people got to see the original dream match in action. Sherri Martel was much more interesting than the actual match. If it wasn't for the managers and valet's this match would have been nothing. The crowd itself wasn't feeling it once the hype dissipated and the match actually started.

I don't even dislike Hogan as an in-ring performer. He's okay when he's in Japan, or when he's working power matches at Wrestlemania, but against Ric Flair the styles do clash. Flair is doing his typical cowardly heel act, while Hogan continues to do the impossible (even power out of the figure four leglock). Check out his matches with Sting and Luger if you want a dream match vibe.

WCW Uncensored 1998 Retro Review

1. Booker T (c) vs Eddie Guerrero (With Chavo Guerrero) for The World Television Championship
Booker T was my first favorite wrestler. I saw him in WWE Smackdown in 2005 and enjoyed his eccentric look and personality. At the time I hated Eddie Guerrero for his creepy heel angle with Dominic (Rey Mysterio's son); I hated him so badly that I regrettably cheered when I found out that he died. Nowadays I love both wrestlers.

Booker T stood out in this match for me. He's a fun power wrestler who just got out of an awesome Tag Team with Stevie Ray. Guerrero is a brilliant heel, and his performance in this match was impressive.

2. Juventud Guerrera vs Konnan
I didn't know much about Konnan as an in-ring performer, but I now see that he's badass. He put Juventud in through various submission manuevers and really made me sympathize with Guerrera. Guerrera just lost his mask to Jericho months ago in a Luchas de Apuestas match up, ever since then he started winning matches in order to gain momentum as a star. In order to sell Guerrera as a new man, he gained the upset victory against Konnan that night.

3. Dean Malenko vs Chris Jericho for The World Cruiserweight Championship
Jericho was getting over big time as a heel; Malenko was getting more over big time as a face. I wanted to watch this ppv for this match alone. This match is full of twists and turns ultimately ending with a Liontamer.

The highlight of this segment is Mean Gene coming up to cut a heel interview on The Ice Man. Malenko, not his usual self is nearly on the verge of tears after losing the match. Gene Oakerland tells Malenko that many people were betting on him winning tonight, and that he's been on a disappointing losing streak. Malenko gets called a loser and is asked "Where are you going, now?" Malenko responds softly "home" before walking out the arena.

4. Lex Luger vs Scott Steiner
I didn't pay attention to this match. I don't watch either of their wrestling matches religiously, nor do I find their style of wrestling appealing. I do enjoy Steiner's old work before he changed his look, but Lex was always ish (that could be interpreted in two ways) for me.

5. Diamond Dallas Page vs Chris Benoit vs Raven in a No Disqualification, Triple Threat Match for The United States Championship
I've recently become a fan of Raven: His moves aren't really flashy and his gimmick can be one-dimensional, but his character/promo cutting/in-ring storytelling is awesome. Benoit was always a favorite of mine, while DDP is someone I have respect for. This match was a pleasant surprise for me and it quickly become my favorite match on the card.

Some of my favorite spots include DDP getting irish-whipped into the pre-jumbotron multiple times, Raven hitting DDP with a fan sign that had a stop sign inside, and DDP hitting Raven with a diamond Cutter off the top rope into a table. Initially this was more of a confrontation with Benoit and DDP with Raven trying to steal the pinfall whenever someone was knocked down.

6. The Giant vs Kevin Nash.
I almost didn't pay attention to this match. The reason I did pay attention was because Kevin Nash was a classic heel, and because I was hoping to see another Jackknife Powerbomb. Sadly, the latter didn't happen as ends in a DQ to advance the storyline. Kevin Nash hit The Giant with a nasty jack-knife powerbomb not too long ago, and this move's legalization was hyped up in the beginning of the show.

7. Bret Hart vs Kurt Hennig (With Rick Rude)
I love Rick Rude, I love Kurt Henning, but I like Bret Hart. He has great matches, great title runs, and his attire/theme music is cool, but he doesn't get me goosebumps like the other two. Kurt puts Bret Hart on a figure-four leglock while Rude would come in to give him some leverage while trademark idiotic ref isn't looking. The ref finally catches Rude in the act and makes Kurt drop the hold. After some selling and some signature moves + pinfall combinations, Bret Wins with a sharpshooter.

8. Sting vs Scott Hall for The WCW World Heavyweight Championship:

I was a little too entranced by Scott Halls macho-cockiness to pay attention to the match at first, but after a minute I was getting into it (no homo to all of that). At times I wish Scott would win The WHC. I know that he was a major druggie, but that excuse doesn't fly with me. If Shawn Michaels could win Three WWF World titles why can't ___ over junkie wrestler here? Still, Sting got the victory in this match. Don't get me wrong, Sting was wavy looking the whole match too, he even helped make the finish great as well.

9. Randy Savage (with Miss Elizabeth) vs Hulk Hogan in a Steel Cage Match.
Miss Elizabeth looks different hot with that hairstyle, I'm still glad she kept her older one. This match doesn't really have a lot of wrestling moves, but it's an aggressive brawl. They even escape the cage to continue the onslaught there, only to come back inside minutes later. That diving elbow drop from the top of the steel cage by Savage was beast. No one can hit the diving elbow drop quite like him. This match ends in a no-contest when Brutus Beefcake breaks the lock and enters the cage to help Hogan.  Savage is outnumbered until Sting comes down from his b-movie harness to aid Macho Man. Macho man hits Sting with a ?piledriver? (I can't remember) only to spit on Hogan and walk away. It was a grudge match for NWO control with two clashing egos; I expected as much.

Overall: Great show. I came for one great match, I was treated to two great matches, four good matches, and a decent main event. It won't be long until the creative team and the bookers mess this up.

Paleo-Libertarians - An Avenue for Good.

I'm starting to become turned off by the "You're miserable because you're free" and "freedom is for beasts" argumentation style. I'm guilty of doing the same thing too; Freedom isn't a net positive and has become a meaningless sacred cow. Most people that are symbols of freedom are degenerates given a reputable image via victor's justice. The modern, secular martyr's are mediocre at best. It's still bad strategy to prioritize condemning freedom as a means of advancing your main causes.

Libertarian's have a bad track record of taking any rejected cows from standard liberalism and making them sacred. While Liberals are busy turning poopdick into an identitarian cause, Libertarian's may focus on something absurd like polyamory. Instead of "democracy now!" it's "smash the state"! Every ideology comes with it's fair-share of neckbeards. In the libertarian sphere there are people that look at fascism as a good thing; There are racialists that care about whites; There are advocates of patriarchy; There are religious people (I was a religious an-cap). These people may not share our philosophical leanings, yet they care more about The West than most Fascists.

If they're so concerned about police brutality, then tell them to kick out the dalits. If some of them don't like it, then they aren't who we're looking for. If they dislike overly-buracratic institutions, then tell them to get rid of feminism/the subversive class. While you're at it, tell them about The Jewish Question. While frequenters of Mises.Org may not look at your positions properly a Paleo-Libertarian certainly will. Instead of going the esoteric-radical direction, it's important to go the moderate, practical direction.

Privilege: Hard Mode

An interesting modern analogy regarding privilege is that it's life on easy mode. Easy mode is a reference to the difficulty setting in a video game (plenty of videogames of many genres have this feature).

Easy Mode:
-Six Figure income (at least).
-White American
-Christian
-Straight
-Cis
-Suburbs

Hard Mode: Social Justice
- $50,000 in debt
-Mullatto/Mestizo
-Atheist/New-Ager
-Pansexual
-Trans
-Gentrified Inner-City

Devil May Cry Mode:
-5 cents
-Sub-Saharan-African
-Animism/Eat the poo-poo Islam

This is purely a class based analysis devoid of any caste. It's obvious that most of the hatred towards the yuppie lifestyle isn't because of it's emptiness, but rather the fact that it's milquetoast. Life under modernism is boring and the suburban lifestyle epitomizes it. The reaction lefties have to the privileged man is to favor degeneracy over the standard yuppie lifestyle.

This typically involves rejecting anything related to the privileged man. Christianity, Whiteness (especially the Anglo variety), and having a happy attitude. Thus "Hard Mode" thinkers tend to appropriate any perspective they think counteracts milquetoast modernism. The problem is that they reconstruct everything they appropriate to fit their needs and their needs only. This is why Social Justice types that typically see themselves in the hard-mode setting are heavily Americanized in their world views.

Now if you excuse me, I'll be replaying my life as a Sub-Suharan-African. Wish me luck.

Dissecting the WWE Hierarchy

With the unification of the world titles and the inevitable unification of the midcard titles, the WWE has less of an ambiguous card. It's easy to rank wrestlers based on where they belong or should belong.

World Title: John Cena, Randy Orton, Daniel Bryan, and CM Punk: These are your main guys at the moment. All are in their thirties and relatively healthy. Now that the WHC has been absorbed by the WWE title Del Rio, Big Show, and Sheamus are disqualified from this position; They're upper midcarders who can fight for the title, but won't hold it for long. If anyone wants to fight for this spot they're going to have to go through these four men.

Midcard Title: Dolph Ziggler, Damien Sandow, Miz, Kofi Kingston: This one is harder to define. So many wrestlers are slightly above/below this level. Christian can easily shoot for this scene or the world title if his injuries don't get the better of him. Kofi already exhausted all the possibilities he has with these four men. His recent feud with The Miz (not the 2012 feud) hurt both superstars and almost jeopardized his spot on this card. Big E Langston and Curtis Axel both hurt their chances with this title; Curtis Axel lost it by being boring, while Langston is utilized improperly by The WWE (he's a naturally funny character, not a serious one). After The Shield collapses the individual members may have a shot at one of these titles, but only against these guys.

Real main event: Brodus Clay, Fandango: Beware, Xavier Woods. Beware.

Why I'm Not a Reactionary

Reactionaries and I have so much in common: We both oppose the status quo, we both love patriarchy, we both love religion, and we both love political systems that manage the masses. Two important things separate me from the typical reactionary: 1. I don't mark any specific point in history as a metric unit for Western Civilization. 2. I don't use the truth that the masses are stupid as the main thesis for my arguments. The latter is much more significant as a point.

It's true that most people are in the left side of the bell curve. Cro-Mags rule in numbers. Politics is the art of curbing stupidity, but it's also the art of curbing corruption. If the latter is emphasized too much, then you may have honest people advocating for the centralization of the masses as a political force (Democracy) or them becoming individually autonomous (Anarchism). In this way the "people are stupid" argument does play a role.

Reactionaries (not all of them) unfortunately automatically assume the worst in the majority of people, which can cause them to undergo The Dunning Kruger effect. All of a sudden a political argument becomes "95% of people can't wipe their ass with the correct technique, therefore Democracy can't work". If they continue to polarize their viewpoints they may start assuming that 99% American's are Lady Gaga fans and that they make up the intellectual vanguard of their movement.

Most importantly, they may criticize useful movements/topics if they're not Reactionary enough. Evola himself has criticized fascism because of it's populistic nature. Movements that are attempting to protect The West may be deemed mediocre because they don't condemn the masses enough, or because they are appealing to the masses. Nazism sometimes gets heat because it sees The State as a means to an end for The Race, and not as The State itself.

A term like Paleoconservative or Traditionalist may describe me in a much better light. Despite that, I'm just a special snowflake; I don't use idealogical terms to identify myself. Why wouldn't I be a special snowflake? I'm sexy.

Edenism, Racialism, and The Power Structure

Edenism is moderately useful for race realists. The fact that blacks have the Homo Erectus gene while non blacks have the neanderthal gene disproves the "Out of Africa" theory. The reason it's only moderately useful is because you can agree with the "Out of Africa" and still be a race-realist; The argument that humans have undergone micro-evolution since the days of Africa is still affective (albeit questionable). For a serious racialist such as myself, Edenism is a useful tool in understanding harder racial narratives. The fact that Aryans started out as hybrids of Cro-Magnon and neanderthal is a pretty useful concept. It explains why whites are so intellectually diverse as a group. It can also explain how a Thal from a Vaisya/Antyaja community can grow up to become a confused Brahmin that hates religion/conservatism for all the wrong reasons.

What it can also explain are some of the faults regarding the black question/The Jewish question. White Jews that make up the elite tend to be Melons, whilst the socially awkward Jewish-kid in your local whole foods couldn't subvert an Ant. Why is this the case? Why is it that we're forced to look up to charismatic plagiarist blacks from the 50's and 60's, yet on the radio all we here is "muh dik"? Racialism is important, yet it has less anthropological dating than some of these archetypes. Politics is a Melon thing. It's a means for the charismatic to rule the docile. This means that removing kebab, bagel, or fried chicken is as easy as neutralizing their Melons. It also means we need to institute some Melon's of our own. Enough with the half-conceived, autistic strategies.

Status quo's are just as easy to remove as they are to maintain. The "Old-White" Anglo-American power structure that gave way to The Judaic power structure; now that political economy is losing relevance something else can replace them.

The Randy Orton Question

Wrestlemania is undoubtably the greatest stage of them all. The only thing left that comes close is January 4 in The Tokyo Dome. Randy Orton hasn't delivered a real match in Mania since the start of his decade. His matches Legacy, Punk, Kane, and the Shield were all "revenge" matches given to him merely so he could do something at Mania. It seems that Orton is finally treading the main event spot in Wrestlemania 30 after half a decade of bad booking. The question is, will Randy Orton deliver?

It wasn't always this way. In Wrestlemania 21 Randy Orton just got off from a successful 2004. His match against The Undertaker popularized ending "The Streak", and overshadowed both main events at that ppv. The bout outshined both Cena and Batista's debut world title reigns. Tangent: To be fair, every match on the card aside from Big Show's outshined both main event matches.

Two things crippled Orton's main event status. His illogical face turn based merely on fan reactions, and the fact that his main event match against HHH at Mania 25 was a cricket fest. Don't worry, I'll make a HHH question blog next week as a response. The good news is that Orton's a heel again, despite not being the same sociopathic heel the WWE needs right now. The bad news is that the WWE is getting worse at booking matches. Orton could end up in another cricket fest if things play out incorrectly.

I don't doubt Orton's abilities in the ring. While he hasn't had an interesting match since his feud with Christian he's still in his physical prime. It's unclear who the WWE wants to see main even mania, but if it's Orton they better book it correctly. 

Evola's Aryanism and Feminism

Evola viewed the Aryan and the Jew as being anti-thetical. The Aryan spiritually stands for nobility; The Jew deconstructs these noble virtues as base level desires. The Jew is thereby reducing the Aryan into a negroid level. This gives me better grounding on how to criticize Feminism. Feminists are "Honorary Jews" in that they deconstruct all patriarchal virtues as lowly base desires. Men no longer build civilizations to honor the long dead or to support their distant offspring; They just want to get laid!  If you fail to showcase any Alpha-male characteristics, any interaction you have with a female will be seen like that as well.

The Aryans and the Negroids are described by Evola as Northerners and Southerners. It's interesting how most postmodern/cultural marxist thinkers will try to make the Aryan sound like the epitome of "muh dik".  Evola sees both the Jew and the Judaicized as forces that must be combated. It's a redundant imperative, but one that must be reflected upon. Both Feminists and MRA's are lost souls existing only to deconstruct.

Could the same be said of other Social Justice movements? Gay Rights movements function strictly as a  Brahmin movement, but they make similar deconstructions to Vaisya whites; Minority rights activists Judaicize multiple races and help them deconstruct Whites as unpunished "muh diks" to their ancestors. It's time to rev up those fryers: We're already starting to become our enemy. If Chav and Zef culture isn't a dead giveaway, then I don't know what is.

World of Aryanism

Pan-Seccessionism sounds like a step in the right direction, however it doesn't always correspond with reality. A region with a 100% black demographic isn't necessarily going to worship gods modeled after black people; The same goes for Oriental mongoloids. There is some degree of Aryanism outside of the west, and it's much stronger than you might think.

When I think about Hinduism, I usually think of guys that look like Apu from The Simpsons. That's just what comes to mind. The Hindu caste system actually leans in favor of Aryanism. When I think of the religion of Islam I think about guys that look like French Montana, yet the upper sects of Islam are really White. Mohammed himself was a ginger. Come to think of it, most prophets in non-western religions had Aryan features too.

The idea I'm going for isn't "White Man's Burden" liberal imperialism. Rather I'm showcasing that there are objective aesthetics that pan-seccessionism doesn't take into account. There's a reason that most Black Nationalists like to claim that white civilizations like Egypt are actually their own. There's a reason that black Jesus (even though Jesus wasn't necessarily Aryan) became a relevant meme decades ago.

The concept of an Aryan race has been corrupted by Liberalism to mean Dravidian blacks. It also a received a necessary exaggeration by Hitler at the time as a reaction to the demographic/socio-economic corruption Germany had to endure at the time. Under Hitler's standards, Slavs weren't considered white. Aryanism itself isn't as mythologized in The West, but it's proven to be relevant wherever mankind exists.

Written in Blood

Civilization is rooted in savagery. Savagery alone doesn't make for a civilized man, but it forms an integral role in shaping him. Take Lions for example: The "King of The Jungle" is almost always overthrown. One of the greatest republics was formed from the overthrow of the monarch; The same republic became one of the greatest empires via the overthrow of the dictator. Hierarchy at it's most raw is Mufasa, Simba, and Scar all playing their part in the Circle of Life.

The modern system uses Democracy as a means of preventing this process. President's are assassinated, but presidents merely serve as puppets. Things like the French Revolution, or the American revolution could never happen now: Who would we target? The White House? Wall Street? Hollywood? Golden Dawn was praised by the Reactosphere for killing an anti-fascist rapper; That's cool, but the corrupt haven't been punished yet. Many of the Brahmin activists have no Savagery in them; They're responsible for a lot of bad things, but they're effeminate pushovers.

No monarchs, no aristocrats: For anyone interested in a coup d'etat this is a predicament. Even Anarchists are confused right now; The Marxists have no direction, all they have are their universities and Tumblr. Neoliberalism and Neoconservatives both run the game. It's television that feeds on the status quo. If history is still written in blood, it's hard to decide who's blood it will be.

Fascism looks like it will need revitalization. If not Fascism, then something similar. We need something that can strike multiple targets, multiple groups of corruption. I'm not sure if it's an ideology or a movement, but we need it.

The Totality of The American Left

Democracy is one thing; At it's best it was American's Aristocratic Republic. Capitalism is one thing; at it's best it was the British Empire. Around this sphere of the right wing, both these things can be questioned, but together they're undoubtably malignant. Democratic-Capitalism is destroying The United States, yet it's also introducing a new element to liberalism: Totalitarianism.

Totalitarianism is generally applicable to centrist/left-wing reaction. Liberalism isn't usually met with the concept of Totality. Totalitarianism can either mean instituting equality, or turning every institution into one body. All institutions are gradually becoming more politicized; Every creative medium and artistic form of expression is following suit.

In what other era would we care about a Chicken Sandwich joint's opinion of Gay Marriage? The secondary goal of every business nowadays is to represent its thede. Starbucks depends upon it's Brahmin consumers in order to thrive as a business, so they sell Beatles albums and hire dykes.

Academia is less concerned with giving students skills and more concerned with propaganda. The student is propagated to be the revolutionary consumer. The very concept of the citizen has been replaced with the consumer; no longer is the civilian given true duties and responsibilities, for he is merely a bookmark for the producer. Purchasing a product is commonly drawn as voting with your currency. Voting is no longer a civic duty in Trans-democracy, but a mere assertion.

Healthcare is being pushed as our Nation's biggest economic issue. What was once a matter of Fraternal Societies is now a pressing economic matter; As consumers it's easy for us to take something as simple as housing, higher education, and currency investments and turn it into a political dilemma.

The main issue with this strand of Totality vs other strands is simple: Nationalism is now considered largely evil, therefore the body formulated exists to protect an isolated peoples; not a nation, rather a country. While The West is largely suffering a demographic problem in it's major cities, the interests of the people are to mask the problem with democratic-capitalist reform.

The Unexamined World

Socrates said that the unexamined life isn't worth living; I want to take that one step ahead: The unexamined world isn't worth living. My biggest fear is becoming like Jacque Fresco or Nelson Mandela: They're still alive with 90+years to boot, but their worldview sucks. They had all this time to become Emperors of Right Wing darkness, yet they chose a different route. Baby Boomers are nearing the end (finally), yet they still have time to make amends.

One of the biggest critiques of Neon Genesis Evangelion is that Shinji is undergoing so much internal struggle, yet it has little to do with Mankind's Demise. He literally learns nothing about his father's Instrumentality plot, Seele, or the corruption of Nerv. This would be okay if he was a side character, but he's the main character. At one point his role becomes that of a GOD and he doesn't even know it.

Most Liberals would agree with everything that I said in the first paragraph, while being the biggest perpetrators of this delusion. The life of a liberal is the life of a perpetual dream in the low church, and perpetual decadence in the high church. They want Michael Jackson betas and John Lennon Alphas; They want the ambiguously weak and the meaninglessly strong.

Contemplate on your life choices, but also look into the external world. The answers that you're looking for may be on the outside. This advice isn't just something I found on a fortune cookie.

My Top 5 Favorite Wrestlers.

5.  The Undertaker: Both me and my Best Friend had an infatuation with The Undertaker as kids. His character was appealing to both kids and adults. Kids were terrified and enchanted by his character, while adults saw a long-haired badass. Not only did his character become more layered with each era, but he lasted numerous decades with the same name. He's had a 5-star match, numerous championships, and numerous main events in Wrestlemania. I doubt there will be anyone else like him in the industry.

4. Booker T: Booker was my first favorite wrestler: I saw him as a kid back when he had dreads and thought he was badass. He always had a crazy look in his eyes, along with a ridiculous breakdance maneuver: Whether he was in the midcard or in the main event I thought he was awesome. No one else can look like lil wayne on bath salts and make it as masculine as he can. I mostly knew him in his WWF days after the invasion angle; Seeing his WCW work proves that there's more to love (he dropped the n-bomb in the early 90's like a boss).

3. Cody Rhodes: At first it seemed like he was a slave to his past: He's the generic son of Dusty Rhodes; He was the younger brother of Goldust; He was a generic "create your own wrestler" in his rookie years. It's safe to say he would be thrown under the David Flair and David Sammartino rejection pile. That was until someone thought it was a good idea to turn him into Dashing Cody Rhodes, then turn him into undashing Cody Rhodes, then change his character 20 other ways. Around this time I finally got back to watching wrestling, so seeing the way his character evolved caught my interest. I do hope that he wins the WWE championship sometime next year; I was hoping he would win it since 2011.

*Naysayers: The common critique with Rhodes is that his in ring work + lispy,droning mic skills suck. Rhodes has an interesting way to present an in-ring story plus an energetic moveset that both kids and grownups can enjoy. He really gets into his character and is believable despite not having the most elegant voice or movement.

2. Edge: Adam Copeland spent the bulk of his career as a midcarder, yet that all changed when he cashed in his MiTB on John Cena. From then on he stayed firmly on The Midcard scene unlike other perma-midcarders. It's too bad that his neck injuries forced him to retire in 2011. His dynamic in-ring moveset, storytelling ability, and blonde-Tarzan appearance made him cool as both face and heel.

*Naysayers: Edge is mostly a bad boy: Nothing more, nothing less. Yes, he does have a few layers to his character from time to time, yet his character will always say midcard more than main event. Despite this criticism he can play against the big stars more believably than some of our current main eventers. The characters that can become national icons like Hogan, Austin and The Rock are hard to come by. Edge is an awesome main eventer regardless of who's the pinnacle.

1. Chris Jericho: It's obvious that Jericho is my favorite wrestler. He's a badass both in and out of the industry. Yes, he selflessly puts over lost causes like Heath Slater; Yes, sometimes he's demoted to the midcard. But for Christ's sake, the guy is a rockstar. His character always becomes layered; His in-ring ability is still physically intense; He's still creating awesome in-ring promos; and the crowd is still popping. He's a beacon of accolades despite never being a top draw.

Institutional Suicide

Excessively educating the masses is a surefire way to bring about political instability and social degeneracy. Literacy isn't necessarily a good thing, after all eating the fruit of wisdom marked the original sin. Wisdom is power and power should be centralized in order to maintain authority. People will always stumble onto written works that go against their masters. Things like the rise in Protestantism, The French Revolution, the disgraces of Communism, the rise in secular-liberalism, and our inability to mature can all be attributed to a rise in literacy rates

Education is a good thing; it's a blessing that Mankind can exercise his agency in a such a manner, however it should be reserved for nobility. Teaching stupid people to read will only give them the "revelation" that they can and should break free from their chains. This overloads the formal institutions that seek to serve and/or regulate the masses, oftentimes to the point that the institutions bring themselves to destruction. This can be seen with industry, government, and marriage itself. It has already lead to the end of the institution of slavery for most of The Western World.

Denying the next generation of mass literacy is typically seen as a "Human Rights" violation. Educational institutions are used to indoctrinate the masses to oppose their masters, while they unknowingly bow down to the orders of the lesser elite. In Kindergarden we learn to associate in the most egalitarian fashion, with no semblance of privilege; by high school  we've rejected the lesser divine (patriarchy and our national identity), but once we head into the university we learn to reject the higher divine. We become the most individualistic of thinkers.

Degeneracy is used to describe those whom fail to showcase proper agency, whilst malice is used to describe those who showcase agency in order to fall short from the grace of the divine. We commit the original sin at an exponential rate, thus plunging all of mankind in a state of doom if leftism persists for too long. Thankfully some do possess the intelligence to find education outside of their indoctrinating institutions (Institutions that intend to destroy themselves with the knowledge that they present), these are the people that possess the knowledge to understand that having a master and a slave is a good thing; they are also the kind of people that could potentially be the catalyst for a new narrative, or the revitalization of the old one.

Tradition and Progress aren't antithetical. Think of them as forces like the Ying and Yang, one balances out the other. There are various directions that can and do work for a better political narrative, one must simply erase the false belief that they're better off dead than enslaved; Such a notion is only fitting for a civilization under a suicidal narrative. Institutional suicide will only mean systematic atomization in the long run, and extinction/absorption in another.

edit 9/29/13: I corrected a few grammatical kinks.

Journey into WWE's Mediocrity Part 2: Democratizing The Program

Since October 1999 the The WWE is now a globally traded stock available in The NYSE. In 2008 ever since Linda Mcmahon's senate run the WWE has gone pg striking a contrast in the show's previous content thus forming the "PG" era by the fans, or how I'd like to call it the "PC" era. While the attitude era during the Russo days stepped into Edgytarian territory with constant gimmicks based on pornographic occurrences, the program was still watchable and had a substance to it, nowadays the program sounds like a complete political ad campaign. Smarter fans have called those five years the "Universe" era, where the wwe performers would call the fans in the audience a universe.

Heels would claim not to care, nor represent the people and exaggeratively blame "Each and every on of you" for the shortcomings of other heels. The faces were politicians that represented or upheld the masses. Cena sounds like a house negro like Obama, whilst Brahmin superstar CM Punk would sound like the voice of the 99%. The midcard dreads would act like non-profit workers selling having fun and doing something for the people. The bottom line is this is where Democracy meets Capitalism: A point that's usually as disastrous as it is difficult to watch.

The WWE opened up a pseudo social network on it's site from 2008-2011 up until they wised up and decided to all rely on Twitter. They would do everything to encourage the people to have a voice in the product, which usually leads to IWC members complaining that their voice isn't heard. Storylines usually feature pencil neck general managers in charge of a business and engaging in corruption on the side whilst ridiculing the public. It's sad when the whole politics is evil/democracy mantra that Moldbug keeps referring to actually makes sense here, it's sad that you can some up everything that's wrong with WWE storylines using Moldbug.

Let's not forget the constant campaigns against bullying, breast cancer, and other trendy social issues. The WWE is becoming so Brahmin friendly I'm not surprised that the same fanbase that would ridicule autistic basement-dwelling IWC geeks now joins them and occupies them. Even wrestling is getting a "women" problem like anything people with Aspergers find cool. Maybe it's because Aspies are naturally matriarchal. I shouldn't talk about my own kind that way.

We even have Stone Cold preaching Democratic values whilst promoting television events like power to the people. Now thanks to cellphone apps we could vote for a matchup on Twitter every now and then. Or we could see what trends we've started of pertinence to the WWE, and who's the most liked/followed superstar along with other platforms the WWE likes to promote. I don't think Tout is going anywhere.

The Return of The Rock and his eventual title gain and makeover has ushered in another pretentious era titled "The People's Era". We get the The Rock is The People's Champion, but even that moniker was far too pretentious to work. It seems any character from the past that returns to Raw gets a new pretentious gimmick and personality that represents the masses. Characters that were entertaining are now supposed to be mystically charismatic; Oh really, we loved Cena for his charisma and not for his alpha personality and homophobia?

With the New Mcmahon administration angle their playing to their anti-fashist cards a little better than usual, but at what point do we break the Democracy Now narrative? I for one am willing to wait, I sit through the product on a weekly basis. I voice my opinions through Youtube, this blog, and Tumblr every so often. The WWE has shown that it can finally deliver an entertaining product which is what I've been asking for a very long time, so when will the narrative finally be somewhat functional again? Not everything his to be reactionary, or traditionalistic (I certainly don't expliciate that identification since the words don't fully compliment my views), but things can at least fit their role. You watch wrestling for fun and entertainment, not because you want to see your voice be heard. You wouldn't use a knife as a spoon, that's not what it's for.

Oh, and nice try with giving Darren Young a mini push when he came out the closet, along with starting that grassroots "Ryder Revolution". You're really showing us how democratic of a company you are: Keep pushing for Sopa.

Society in a Vacuum

Civilization requires an explicit hierarchy, lest it fester into vacuous society. Liberalism has roots in Masonry, meaning that it was always a ploy for a bunch of Aristocrats to come into power. Aristocracy requires the removal of Monarchy in order to form. Classical liberalism (which is Libertarianism) formed as a way to get the masses against their monarchical chains, which was highly successful thanks to the rise in literacy. Liberals, like the masons have always held on to baggage that contradicted or opposed the divine.

Anarchism itself is an Aristocracy stripped away from the masses in order to form a society within a vacuum. Anarchism can only work once heavily institutionalized with a consensus of literates, it's only become somewhat democratic since the twentieth century. Actually, the turn of the twentieth century has introduced the democratized version of Classical Liberalism known as Neo-Liberalism, thus forming Libertarianism as a natural reaction to the rise of the New Left. Libertarians starting forming "Right-Wing" counterparts, whom would fall into reactionary viewpoints along with the conservatives. Conservatives themselves were always the group that would slow down the cataclysmic advances of standard leftism.

In between the transition of Aristocratic and Democratic liberalism was fascism, communism, nationalism, and a fondness for dictatorships. Marx advocated a dictatorship of the working class, which may sound quite reactionary now, but it was and still is of negative consequence. Giving the masses free reign for an autocratic ruler that represents them isn't a good thing. Marx himself was a manipulative Brahmin, quite similar to the cultural Marxist professors of today. As for the more nationalistically driven aspects of dictatorship fetishes, they're a consequence of the left intellectually deconstructing anything of divine semblance leaving only profanity and meager attempts at restoring cultural providence.

Going back to the subject of anarchy. Anarchism has also become democratized, with the vacuous and institutionalized role of Anarchy reverting back to the masses separated form their master or elites. The result is that modern strains of Anarchy seek to use everything to give the slaves power and separation from any authority. This is mocked by classical Anarchists as being a contradiction to the older, more sophisticated strain of Anarchism; It's very similar to how the libertarians/classical liberals mock the modern, neo-liberals (Likewise the conservatives).

Capitalism is seeing the worse of this, with the rising decline and/or absorption of the Optimates and the rise of Brahmin rule, Capitalism is the cornerstone for globalistic democracy. No longer will private property be the antithetical force against democracy, but now they will join together. As a result Anarcho-Capitalism has claimed so many of my fellow Aspies on the internet, and for that it will pay. Yet the gradual discontentment with Democracy and it's usage of private property has turned many An-Caps into more reactionary positions. This can be expressed in the rise of Anarcho-Monarchism, Anti-Statism, or Moldbuggean viewpoints that become starter points for more sophisticated reactionary-positions, however in order to compete against the monolithic bastardization of all that is holy, we need something with more substance.

Journey into WWE's Mediocrity Part 1: Death of Territories = Brahmin Dominance

I'd like to start off by saying that the past few months have been excellent for Monday Night Raw. I never saw such a streak of interesting programming since the summer of 2011 which was mostly thanks to Punk and Rhodes for me. The revitalization of The Mcmahon family as a heel staple, Randy Orton as a heel champion, D-Bryan is the top babyface, the incorporation of The Rhodes family into things have all worked together seamlessly. Even Cena was interesting prior to his injuries, and Punk was damn well exhilarating.

Let's move on the the real topic: Wrestling has been in a decline for at least half a decade. Sports entertainment no matter how drenched in kayfabe, and soap opera nonsense is an important aspect of our television culture. Since the 1950's professional wrestling has thrived on the television and vice-versa. Look at the statistics for wrestling programming at it's highest and it's impact on our hyper-capitalistic culture and you'll find that it's a little more than Homoerotic Twister.

Jim Cornette besides being the most liberalistic southerner I've ever heard of can vouch for me on this one. The end of the wrestling territories meant the end for the initial soul of the industry and its talent. Wrestling Started out in little territories all sanctioned out and divided by the NWA; Not the rap group, but rather the National Wrestling Alliance; They insured that not one promotion wouldn't try and dominate the other.

In the Vaisya territory of the south you had legends like Dusty Rhodes, Ric Flair, Magnum TA, and Jerry The King Lawler; In the Brahmin territory of the Northeast coast you had guys like Bruno Sammartino, Buddy Rogers, Billy Graham, Pedro Morales, Bob Backlund and Andre The Giant. For the most part even though The East coast had Madison Square Garden, the star quality of the south always kept them in equilibrium.

Vince Sr. made sure that his business wouldn't bankrupt the other territories, where this son whom bought the company from his dying pops had "better" plans: In the middle of the 1980's Vince was going to take over the nation, which lead the other territories to unify under reaction. Thus WCW was made in order to compete with the WWF. The WWF acquired the one and only Hulk Hogan whom was fired by Vince's dad for playing a major role in Rocky III: He was over in the AWA yet mistreated by the higher ups for his "lack" of technical ability.

The key was to form the Wrestling equivalent of The Superbowl, complete with heavy patriotism to appease to the youth suffering from the nihilism of the Cold War, amongst other wars or future wars of that period. As with anything in the 1980's loving your country was as deep as waving a flag around and chanting "muh freedomz" with colorful protagonists. WCW in it's early NWA/Jim Crocket-esque days got the jump with Starrcade, yet WCW still killed that event with the inclusion of Mr. T and Cindi Lauper.

Future stars taken from the NWA would be repackaged to destroy the territories. Enter The Ultimate Warrior, and The Undertaker. Once the 1980's were over and steroid allegations became rampant WCW had the oppurtunity to rise as a promotion. Eventually they got Hogan and their billionaire in Southerner Ted Turner. It wasn't long until they formed a counter-culture storyline in the NWO from elements of Japanese Wrestling storylines.

WCW was now a southern empire of professional wrestling with it's own program of "Monday Nitro" to compete with WWF's "Monday Night Raw". Before they can be wiped out, The WWF made their own counter culture face in Stone Cold Steve Austin. This time it's a Southerner dishing out payback to his Yankee boss and his spoiled family. This lead the Rock in his peripheral souther glory to shine. Eventually WCW had to fall, their Writing team and booking declined, and Turner (like a liberals) made a bad investment causing Time Warner to crash.

WCW died in a shocking fashion, with the WWF buying them out, then humiliating them in buy broadcasting their show live simultaneously with Raw to reveal the truth to the public. Ultimately this leads to the ridiculously bad Invasion storyline, along with a brand split to keep up with the new talent from WCW and ECW.

As a result we now have TNA that's mostly set in arenas from the south to compete with the WWE. Granted, even with Hogan as head commissioner they still can't compete with the now global corporation that is The WWE. To prove that they cater to a perverted Vaisya audience they broadcast their show on Spike Tv: Home to MMA which is too scary for the Brahmins (aside from the frat boys). Various TNA wrestling gimmicks and characters are too southern for the WWE (Freakin' Cena is from a suburb in Massachusetts).

To compensate for the ultra brahmins in the east coast too radical for Vince we now have ROH to compensate for ECW. Instead of hardcore "wrestling" matches we now have wrestling with a technical pedigree to keep the autistic fans interested. Even though some events are set in the hipsterific parts of the midwest, it's a clear show for the more degenerate flocks of Brahmins.

It's clear that modern wrestling is treading dangerously close waters to Starbucks territory, especially with entertaining yet militantly brahmin superstars like Cm Punk and Daniel Bryan finally getting a rise from the indies to the top spots in the WWE. Other wrestlers that are encircling the midcard and main event seem more like college fratboys in their 30's still in developmental territories learning the basics of working a match.