Thoughts on Wrestlemania 29 Match Card

I did something like this for the previous Wrestlemania on Tumblr, yet it was far less organized. Things are different now: People actually care about what I have to say, therefore recording my thoughts for this blog is the most ethical choice. Here are my thoughts on each Wrestlemania Match scheduled for April the Seventh.

Chris Jericho vs Fandango: Make no mistake that Chris Jericho is my favorite wrestler in the business; Nobody can tell an in ring story, make a promo, or work a superstar the way he can. I'm always the first to moan when Jericho has to job to somebody, but this is too much. Having Jericho booked to face NXT season 4's winner Johnny Curtis on his new "Dancing With The Stars" gimmick is too ridiculous.  Randy Savage, Undertaker, and Now Jericho can go on a list of most undeservingly-badly booked matches. What pisses me off the most is seeing Fandango get on the top rope, engage in the most disturbing of theatrics right before performing a leg drop on Y2J. If you're going high-risk on Jericho hit him with an impressive move for crying out loud!

Tons of Funk and the Funkadactyls vs Team Rhodes Scholars and The Bella Twins: Cody Rhodes shouldn't be booked here: This is a clusterfuck, comic relief match that serves as the de-facto bathroom break. Cody Rhodes has been booked much better in the last three wrestlemania matches. There's not a single tag team here that isn't a joke. Don't get me wrong, Damien Sandow is a great talent, but he's a traditional cartoony heel. In working with Sandow, Rhodes has become a cartoony heel as well, dropping his Sociopathic character, for a Mustachio douche personality that'll guarantee Cody won't be seeing a title in his future.

Team Hell No vs Dolph Ziggler and Big E Langston: I actually like Team Hell No; They're a team of underrated, talented wrestlers that aren't being used properly. They even work well together, that steel chair segment on Smackdown was my favorite part of Smackdown for 2012 hands down. Big E and Ziggy are going to be invisible though, for whenever AJ is involved on a match it's all about her. I don't really want to see this match, but I at least like all the people involved, even Langston.

Alberto Del Rio vs Jack Swagger: Swagger has been given a new manager, and a new edgier gimmick. I don't see the connection to Illegal immigration and Alberto Del Rio. Story doesn't really make sense when you think about it, and I don't know how they're going to continue it once their feud is over. Yet I do like seeing an aggressive Swagger with a traditional heel persona. Del Rio is doing a better job as a babyface than I thought. While he certainly isn't a convincing World Champion, and I'm not even sure if he draws money, I really like his change in character and his versatility. Both these guys are great in the ring, and can hopefully put in the best psychology with all that's happened in their feud.

Sheamus, Orton, and Big Show vs The Shield: The Shield is my favorite stable of the decade. The Nexus, Aces and Eights, and Corre are all quantity over quality teams with no internal logic. The Shield has an interesting comic-book vibe, and balanced cast of wrestlers. Ambrose is the best on the mic and in telling an in ring story, Rollins has potential baby-face charisma and a beast move set, while Reigns is big, badass and handsome. As for the babyfaces, I hope they get their asses handed to them.

Ryback vs Mark Henry: Both men can't wrestle. This is undeniable, yet despite this I'm excited for this match. Mark Henry changes my mind about him all the time. The Hall of Pain character, his entrance, and his aggression makes up for everything that he doesn't have and much more. Ryback has spent a long time in developmental territory, yet he still sucks ass. Ryback needs the win in this, however I hope he receives a beatdown curtesy of sexual chocolate.

Brock Lesnar vs Triple H: I love HHH, and I love Lesnar. While both are hated for being overrated by the knowing, and loved for being good by the unknowing, they both have what it takes to make a wrestlemania card shine. I don't give a fuck about the shitty storyline this rematch is based on, all that matters is that with the added stipulation it could be more aggressive than ever. Let's be honest Hunter depends on chair shots for these mania matches, without carnage they would simply be repeated sections of his finisher again and again. Lesnar can be a suplex machine, and or a ground and pound guy on top of the hardcore stipulations and still kick ass.

Wade Barret vs The Miz: I used to hate The Miz, I still do. I used to hate Wade Barret, ever since Survivor series 2011 that has changed. Wade better retain the title, because The Miz is annoying whether he's face or heel.

Undertaker vs CM Punk: Punk deserves this. Even without the title reign eclipsing a year, Punk has been in the main event scene this year more than last year. Looking at the death of Paul Bearer, one could see the streak might survive, yet looking at Chicago's Bulls recently end the streak for Miami heat once could assume this is the end. Other than that both wrestlers have intense versatility in taking on whoever they meet in the ring. This will definitely have a better in ring story than the last two streak matches at mania, and with less time too.

Rock vs Cena: I don't care. Suck my dick, Nigga.

All They Ask For is Equality

Coming back from a long awaited hiatus, I finally have something to rant about. You see this week started with the rise of a new meme: A red, Flintstones vitamin palette equal sign started spreading everywhere on Facebook. It's the new image for the gay marriage movement. It's already being parodied everywhere with crude pictures mimicking it. Despite being made fun of, many young fools aspiring to look socially-conscious are using this image as their profile icon. That reminds of the time around October 2010 where people changed their profile icons to pictures of cartoon characters in order to stand up for child abuse: It was noble, until it was discovered that this was a hoax used by actual child molesters and that authority's were checking to see who has an animated profile picture.

Did you hear that? I'm saying that an internet mass-movement is being conducted through ignorance and general stupidity! That's nothing new. From prior knowledge the people who do change their profile icons are generally hard leftists, who hold their political inconsistencies personally. My prior knowledge comes from actually knowing who these people are on a social/personal level. These people  like me had to suffer through a broken family, yet instead of identifying the problems in Cultural-Marxism, they embraced these doctrines and condemned everything else. They sealed their own fates, which means I have little empathy.

As for gay marriage in-and-of-itself, It's obvious that I dislike it. Marriage is defined most profanely (yet truthfully) as monogamous prostitution; It's an exchange of male protection for female fertility: It's also the reason why K-type environments are so useful for mankind. With the K-type environment mankind can put it's intelligence to use by creating civilization and using artifice for its own personal good. Gay marriage is more about Marxism's goal of destroying society from within and inciting insurrection amongst the broken masses. Feminism, the ease of divorce, and laws that hurt the father have created atomized, disenfranchised children, Imagine what the next phase will be.

Moreover Cultural-Marxism is most successful in the bringing in of foreigners to internally dissolve and replace the host-civilization. White female-feminists have recently been taking heat for using Feminism to exercise White-privilege. The story for White LGBT-gays will be no different. The genepool and the culture are both key components in the Cultural Marxists goals of destroying civilization. Surely gay-marriage isn't worth the death of Faustian Civilization (Western Civilization).

On A Positive Note for Punk vs Rock

I feel like my first two wrestling posts gave me a false impression of being too pessimistic. While the match itself was a disappointment and this feud is a mean for a terrible end in terms of transitioning to Cena vs Rock II, there are some good things to say about it. The serious promos the wrestlers delivered to each other were pretty good and CM Punk is being treated as more of a main event player now than ever in 2012. His match against The Rock main evented The Royal Rumble, which is by the way the second main event in the entire history of the ppv that wasn't actual rumble (the first was Kurt Angle vs Mark Henry in 2006). Punk was in the main event instead of John Cena, and Cena actually did compete in the ppv. I'm sure Punk will main event The Elimination Chamber as well, after all the only chamber match will be for the World Heavyweight Championship currently held by Alberto Del Rio.

Best of all Technically Punk did defeat The Rock in the main event of a big four ppv, something Cena can't currently admit to doing. Granted this is before they restarted the match, but the history books cannot lie. If anything the rumors of a Punk vs Taker match sound more promising than ever now that Punk has solidified himself as main event material. By the way, fuck all these dirt sheets. Either most of them are bullshit, and/or their premature discovery cancels the original plan thus ruining it for everybody. The fact is that the internet is full of annoying snarky assholes that will stop at nothing to get niggas hype for nothing.

Who knows what's in store for the future of this product? The right word is product and not promotion because The WWE is just another corporate-liberal piece of crap that I'm sucked into, and there's nothing wrong with that. Just like the majority of people won't like the products that Disney puts out anymore, people won't like the majority of products The WWE puts out anymore too. That doesn't mean that when the next pixar film comes out that I'm going to save my money, that also doesn't mean that when Jericho decides to do something interesting that I'm going to save my money.

Cena vs Rock II

Everyone and their grandma predicted this, but not everyone has shown proper anger in regards to it. The Rock's victory over Cena at Wrestlemania 28 could not be their conclusive fight. The WWE will surely like to milk their successes last Wrestlemania and try to even Cena's record over The Rock, because god forbid you make Cena look inferior to The Rock in the pecking order. With Cena's victory at The Royal Rumble and The Rock picking up a victory over Punk at The Royal Rumble, their conflict is written in the stars. After all Cena already made up his mind on Raw who he's going to face and Punk clearly isn't going to win his rematch against Rocky.

Many Punk apologists say that Punk deserves better than to lose to a transitional champ like Dwayne. I'm pretty sure when Cena was making these grievances they weren't on his side, but now that Punk is the one that's losing his spotlight these Smart Marks are jumping to the other spectrum of the knee-jerk reaction. Hypocrisy is inevitable in a corrupted fanbase of fake-ass indie fanboys. Rock Fanboys are also on their bullshit talk, claiming that Rock being a bigger draw is better than having the 434 midcarder holding the title. While last raw did draw a 3.7 which didn't happen since perhaps Raw 1000, that's not an impressive draw, considering they were getting that in the late 2000's too and the company was on its Pg bullshit then too. Furthermore The Rock is another transitional champion anyway, he has to drop the title to Cena at the biggest show of them all because he needs to go back to his main gig.

I don't want to see this match again, granted I won't see this match again, because I'm not going to buy the ppv. I might get tickets to the show just for the experience of being in my second WWE show. Wrestlemania is not going to succeed from the main event, rather something needs to steal the show. Cue another Undertaker and Shawn Michaels, Rock vs Hogan, or any other non main-event match of that caliber. What I mean is that there needs to be a match on that card that's going to need to steal the show before the main event in order for this to work.

Cena and The Rock can't deliver. The Rock is much rustier than anyone involved in the product is willing to admit. These botches he makes keep fucking up the show, let's not forget these matches don't really deliver. John Cena's greatest match was against Lesnar at Extreme Rules for crying out loud. That's not in insult to Lesnar, but they didn't face off at a big four ppv; They faced off at a filler ppv for a filler matchup that was building up to nowhere for Cena. Rock fans are going to be pissed when they realize that Cena's walking out of this the winner, and if not: The third time is always the charm.

How fucked up can things get before the WWE decides to take some pride and control over their product? Nothing really has direction anymore, I can see what directions things are heading, but I can't see a properly woven plot anymore. Point A no longer connects to Point B, rather it crashes into it. Granted my pessimism should be considered a good thing. If I'm not pissed about what's happening it means that this company has fucked up to the point of disenfranchising me from it. This isn't the case at the moment, rather I'm getting dangerously close, moving to the point of having to rant my ass off about how badly they're building this road to Wrestlemania so far. I truly hope that the next eight weeks are moving to a prettier direction. It's come to me hoping again.

Politics is Pornographic

There's something I find disturbing in people using politics to satisfy their ego and id urges. The idea of a charismatic puppet like Barack Obama's words being sweet like nectar to a large demographic gives me the creeps. Back when I was a church goer many biblical verses and preachings described the word of god as being sweet like honey, or something delectable in some way, shape, or form. People really resonated and felt a comforting familiarity with the verses, but especially with the testimonies: Testimonies were described as being a shocker to other people in how they would understand what the speaker was going through.

Do people really look at Barack Obama's constant references to other people's life stories and feel like they're story is being told? I honestly can't wait for Obama to leave just because I'm tired of hearing these stories of a little transexual teen in Syracuse trying to pay for his estrogen dose; I honestly couldn't care less. Turns out everybody else is getting off to his words, while I'm growing more and more disgusted.

Perhaps they look at Obama like a father figure, a savior, maybe even a patriarch. I'll repeat, maybe even a patriarch. If you think about it that way, why wouldn't they look at him that way? He's promising "Affordable Healthcare" and pushing for more social programs that put food on their plate. The females will naturally love that; They'll also love his aloof personality. The kids will treat him like a father figure, especially if their father is a beta male, dead, imprisoned, divorced, or a no show. After all he does look like a man that has it all figured out, granted he has it all figured out with a full career in the public sector, but now I'm just hating.

In many ways Barack Obama is just like what John Cena has become! All that energy being delivered to appeasing maternalism, and none of it for the men in need of putting their testosterone to good use. It's kinda sad really, but Left and Right are really similar to Face and Heel. Forget slave morality, we're dealing with the ethics and the moral values of an audience watching a circus show! The only difference here is that we're not seeing a decline in a company with Barack Obama, we're seeing a decline with an entire nation.

I'm not concerned for the people that support Barack Obama, I'm concerned for people that have a crush on him. These are the mislead fools that need to be guided and saved. They could be admiring something so beautiful, yet their heart is set on something that doesn't love them back and probably never will. What they need is the presence of the divine, now if only Western Civilization was constructed out of a religion that worshiped something divine...

CM Punk vs The Rock

It's not uncommon for most people to be more invested in Punk vs Rock than they were for Punk vs Cena. With half the build up they managed to get twice the hype based just on their promo on January 7, 2013. There's no doubt in most people's minds that this will lead into Rock winning, and all of this culminating into another Cena vs Rock match at Wrestlemania. I'm not most people, however. I'm much more pessimistic and my optimism always heads to fringier directions.

 Punk has become iconic within the WWE for dropping real talk, yet his new heel angle is nowhere near as layered as his 2009-2011 heel run. His promo on the go home show for Monday Night Raw has him critique the masses and The Rock for representing them. If you know me, there's no room within me for sympathy for the masses, despite this turning Punk into a cowardly heel that cheats his way for the top is too cheap for him.

As for The Rock. This Rock is nowhere near the same character as The Rock from The Attitude Era: Part of what I hate about the pg era is that the wwe fans and audience are now being called a universe, no longer having their own distinct character like ECW, The Attitude Era, or WCW. Instead the WWE has remodeled their audience from being distinctly snarky and energetic to being the idiot masses everyone hates. Every face is now a politician, they certainly speak like one. How different is John Cena and his transformation from The Rock and his transformation as a character. While The Rock certainly was "The People's Champion" that term has taken a new cryptic life of its own.

These are both Talented wrestlers and entertainers who have been given the wrong character roles to play. They need to have a beast match for this Royal Rumble. There's no question about it. The best thing going for this match and feud is that it isn't John Cena vs The Rock. That match was manufactured by Stephanie Mcmahon to be a Team Edward vs Team Jacob wank fantasy. Here there is the vital order of wrestling. You have a face and you have a heel. Someone is trying to get heat in order to get the other guy over. While you could have an excellent feud without an objective good guy or bad guy like the streak matches that Undertaker has it's better for people that are on equal terms. Rock and John Cena were never on equal terms. Similarly to Triple H the WWE has wrongfully given us the facade that Cena is a Hogan/Austin/Rock figure, when in reality he's not.

There's not doubt that the fate of this company lies in the hands of a good road to Wrestlemania, for the WWE is treading dark waters with it's low television ratings and PPV buyrates. The good thing is that the WWE is abandoning Linda's senate campain, however they need to drop their corporate system as it's hurting the company to have to pay their shareholders. This in itself is a tangent, yet it all contributes to the pressures of having this road to Wrestlemania outshine the last one. In the year 2012 the WWE only had one good month, which was the month of April. Here at the very least they need a good season to propel them back to sunshine.

Change and Forward?

In the video "Flyswatting: President Obama" Youtube user Studentofobjectivism has described Barack Obama as a thinker who holds views opposite to the truth. In other words, if your position is the opposite of Barack Obama's position that's an indicator that your position is the correct one. While I'm not an Objectivist by any means I agree with that analysis to a large extent. The problem lies in the fact that in the leftist world truth is layered in entropy. While Barack Obama's Ivy League Marxism and progressivism are inferior to Ayn Rand's Objectivist mode of thought, they both hold narratives that contradict the complex and ordered narrative that has existed in the right wing.

Let me explain what I mean by complex: To be complex is to possess the artifice vital to prevent ourselves from rapidly changing and being melded by the natural world. It's becoming more and more clear that our monogamous breeding patterns, use of marriage and preferences for people that look more like use has slowed our evolution pattern more than other animals, however that loss in entropy has given us a more complex and stable conception of ourselves.

Contrast this with leftist policies that hold on to a narrative that wants us to speed up our evolution to the point of losing this stable and fixed conception of ourselves. Racial integration, Feminism/Marxism, LGBT equality, Ableism and other ideologies mentioned are just a means to an end. At one hand we can assume that the ultimate goal is Anti-Natalism/Efilism which seeks to end all life as a mark to end all suffering, or we can look towards something similar to instrumentality from Neon-Evangelion Genesis where the final stage of evolution is turning all life into a homogeneous ocean of orange semen.

Moving onto the original subject which is Barack Obama, what exactly is the deal with hope, change and forward? Barack Obama has created propaganda via an internet meme, and through Facebook nonetheless (Zuckerberg being another Harvard Ivy League fisher for the degenerates and puppet for Big Brother). All these words are just ways to arouse the masses that rely upon slave morality. Masses have always ultimately depended upon the idea that the future is a higher place, because the tribes and smaller civilizations didn't have this concept died from the depression and loss of hope.

It's come to this: Civilization is so atomized and depressed that people need to rely on an internet meme that the future might be a better place to function as better slaves to an elite that is no longer noble and sovereign, but has now fallen to degeneracy. The geniuses can tell that homogeneity is the long term goal at least in terms of intuition. However the narrative has become so manipulated by the left that our societies very best isn't moving against this movement, but rather actively working for it, or staying in the sideline.

The first thing you should take from all of this is that hope is a good thing. No hope equates to instant death and despair, you could literally fall over dead from a lack of hope, however moving forward and starting a change are completely different concepts. It seems that we should be moving backwards, rather than moving forward, and  instead of changing we should be reverting back to what we once were. Instead of becoming a more intricate and distinct group/nation/etc we are becoming more and more homogeneous and suffering a giant identity crisis because of it. 

So what should you hope for then? That's not a question I have a complete answer for, but you should be able to understand what has a complex, substantial value in your life. Protect it at all costs before it's too late, if it is too late on the other hand, it's best to abandon ship. Not everyone gets things right the first time, but so long as you're still alive you can make things right again. Just try to avoid institutionalized dick cheeses like Barack Obama who don't hold people like you to their best interest. By people like you I mean people that aren't his daughters, nor his wife. Try and think about that for a second.