The Nature of Social Justice

This is becoming a fallback topic for me: Social Justice movements change with each passing generation, and develop into different waves. This stuff is canonical to anything you might read about in the manosphere, but it gets a little deeper. For now, I want you to notice a pattern.

It starts out first-wave feminism's goal of giving Women property rights and suffrage, then it proceeds to Second wave feminism's goal of throwing a massive number of females into the workforce and enforcing sexual harassment lawsuits while bringing reproductive rights into modern discussion, lastly it's third-wave feminism's goal of gender fluidity and broadening the definition of rape, and the introduction of women into the military. 

For Gay rights activism it's a little more simple. There's the decriminalization of Sodomy, followed by the urge to serve in various institutions while being openly revealing their sexuality, and now Gay marriage which is America's favorite public concern and media distraction. 

What we can see is that it becomes more and more democratized as more generations pass. What liberalism passes as freeing the chains, is nothing more than totality. Postmodernism and liberalism doesn't move past the slave-Master relationship, the game is still being played, rather it's being played on a dysgenic scale. 

Females having an institutional edge over males means an end to monogamy, along with the future of the institution of marriage if same sex marriage spreads throughout Western Civilization. The same could have been said about Romantic Love's affects on marriage, yet that's another story. The point being that we're going to be seeing a collapse of everything on an institutional level, and on a voluntary level. Henceforth why there's a rise in Single Parenting, extended adolescents, a decline in the birthrate, and foster children. Social atomism is on a rise, and everyone is suffering from it.

For those of you that are curious, there's a reason that I left out the race issue. It's a bunch of movements from different minorities working together like cartilage. Ain't nobody got time for dat. We already know the dysgenic effects of Race mixing recklessly; I'm not even speaking in terms of reproduction, I'm also talking about the mixing of cultures and mere association without the proper slave-Master relationship being taken into account. Morever the rise in Dalits, Helots and other foreign casts becomes more than just a cultural issue.

Granted, there's always political reaction against any social justice movement. The issue is whether or not the reaction is traditional, or eugenic. The former being essential to fully repair the faults of the modern social justice movement, while the other is more immediate, yet can ultimately lead to the same results taken out of moderation.

Ultimately the rise in democracy, secularism, and polyamory can only manifest itself negatively. I don't think "IT'S HAPPENING", but it could be that bad.

Smashing

Don't get me wrong, I detest nanny-statism with every fiber of my being. The modern statist is the consequence of post enlightenment ideals, after all government (not the same thing as The State) that serves the people can only corrode the people. With that being said Anti-Statists are in the wrong about a very useful institution. 

If governments are institutions that possess the chains for the masses, The State possesses the whips for the masses. Violence isn't a necessary evil, nor is it a malleable accident, but rather it's a neutral force that only has moral substance in what it's being used for; The same function goes for The State. Statism is an exemplary device not only for defensive purposes, but also for ambitious ones. It's about time we start seeing The West return to its imperial passions instead of this globalistic, egalitarian knock-off.

That passion still remains, as we use the iron hands of The State to destroy our own wealth. Unfortunately, this only compels those that remain faithful to the spirit of The West to fantasize of The Happening. NWO Martial Law, Armageddon, A race war, A failed economic state, even a zombie apocalypse: That's the new Western fantasy. When the iron hands of violence (The State) aren't appropriated for good, the good will want it gone.

In my blog "Nerdism and Property" I revealed my thoughts on NAP,Primary-Directive, Formalistic jargon; At the same time, I neglected to tackle the White Nationalist motto of "Whites for white nations, Blacks for Black Nations, and Asians for Asian Nations", Whilst I still have my nationalistic sympathies all these principles unrealistically neglect that might makes right. No, the U.S making Somalia its colony isn't advantageous or intellingent, but there are places that I can think of that are.

Jizztastic

Let's make it clear that might doesn't make right. After all, blunt force is no match for puritanical morality, or if the 50-shades-of-grey realm of Robert Greene is more to your liking then shallow displays of status trump all. Instead of investing all that energy into fulfillment and becoming the strongest, most complete version of yourself you should mutate into something that deviates far from your original role and spend that excess amount of energy in meaningless leisure.

Who needs to conquer the unconquerable when you can try every drug in the world? Who needs to try every drug in the world when you can try becoming every gender in the world (there's much more than just two, you know)? Who needs to do any of that when you can try all the flavors of Ben and Jerry's ice cream?

What better way is there to bring about this renaissance of orgies and high fructose corn syrup, than for us to bring in a working class of foreigners whom are not yet ready to let go of their past cultures and accept their new culture? We'll give them an early taste of our 21st century enlightenment. Of course, it's a little more complicated than that.

Don't Look Within

There's a visible pattern in bad philosophy: It requires us to undergo an internal struggle as a means of dealing with our internal misery, with the expectation of causing external good. The problem with this mentality is that the mind of the subject is not a good foundation for meeting existential needs. The essence of the individual is what gives him the strength to carry on. Without the essence there is no peace, one's own body carrying out its basic functions for survival can cause the subject harm if he lacks the essence to protect himself, therefore it is imperative that any philosophical viewpoint that lacks a healthy foundation for one's essence be replaced with one that does.

An early example of this is Gnostic Christianity that requires understanding the knowledge of Jesus Christ's teachings as a means of going to heaven instead of the typical process. Interestingly enough the Gnostic gospel's Jesus has a Nietzschian vibe that's antithetical to the Jesus we typically know of. The knowledge of this Jesus's teachings is more important in this case than our faith in him, however even in the possession of this knowledge new holes form. Those who are spiritual, yet lack religion are merely using their religions as a means to create their own world narrative, enter protestantism.

Now Protestantism has a different history, and it's certainly become something different from what it originally was. However the variety of different denominations with different principles shows that it certainly goes through the motions a lot more than usual: Pentecostals that value undergoing religious experiences, 7th day adventists with their strange diet plan, and Calvinists with their predestination beliefs. Once you step into these churches, you typically learn that God has a plan for each and every one of you, how do you know of this plan? Just look into your heart, maybe he wants you to sing right now, or maybe he wants you to open a charity, but he has a plan for you. Of course Satan is also speaking inside your head, so you have to make the distinction from the voices of the flesh and god's plan.

Going back to AP English/your freshman year in philosophy class there's also nihilism, which embodies the words of Nietzsche. Nihilism is interesting because almost every political ideology is based on this viewpoint. Everyone uses Nietzsche for their thesis, even though everyone's debating each other. It's not hard to tell why: God has "died", yet everyone's an ideologue nowadays. The problem with nihilism is that on one hand it believes that man can transcend without god, and on the other it believes that some men can fall into the abyss and take off with anything of value. Sadly many people have tried to fall into the abyss because of this, and instead of leaving as transcendent beings, or monsters, they leave as Rainbow Anthropomorphic Ponies.

V for Voluntary!

The Recipe for Disaster/The Formula for Success

Leftist politics/philosophy is becoming more and more radical, yet it's also taking on several (almost unrelated) issues at once. In fact, I wouldn't even call this a liberal only thing, after all conspiracy theorists love to throw random tidbits into their documentaries, thus making reactionaries tackle numerous issues at once. This is only one half of an unchecked for part of human nature and intelligence. Another issue is the fact that each ideology continues to radicalize as their narrative continues. After all, Marx would have never suspected the radicalism his views would bear.

It seems that we are gradually crystallizing and radicalizing/polarizing our viewpoints each time we reflect upon them. This is why simply taking the principles of an idea can oftentimes gradually lead to taking on an entirely different worldview. The oppression narrative originally started on the basis of workers rights, yet as the narrative progresses it moves on to race, gender, and sexual orientation. This is why it's not weird for someone to be called "Racist, Sexist, Homophobic, and bigoted" for being pro-life.

It's for this reason that those in the Right Wing act differently as well. Right Wingers instinctively target multiple agendas in their critiques and must find ways to connect them. The difference is that to anyone else who isn't consciously connecting these issues, they must fall into the grace of those that can explain and connect the narrative to them. This typically means that they'll fall into various leftist perspectives, either that or they'll be conservatives, AKA liberals minus 20 years. This presents a problem for us, as we'll have to reprogram everyone in terms of their outlook on the world. It's not going to be nearly as bad as how the White Nationalists/Libertarians/Manosphere will want us to believe. Their difficulties stem from the fact that they still have issues of their own that they must deal with. Which is why their debates tend to be squash matches. Sadly, we will have to stomach through Lefty land, in order to take over the narrative.

Edit: 7/20/13: I know the term tumblr users like to use is intersectionality, yet I wrongfully neglected to take that term into account.

The Illusion of Tyranny/Waiting for Death

The typical critique of slavery is that it renders man into machine, that the enslaved subject becomes an object; The typical problem with critiques of "objectification", is that the solution typically creates a worse objectification. Such is the case with the slave/Master relationship, a relationship where both parties have an objective goal. By taking away the chains of the slave, you are robbing him of that clarity, of that cosmic resonance, thus rendering him in an animalistic environment.

The modern economy is seen as a series of distractions where the typical person is searching for some illusion of tyranny. Schools initially act strict and unforgiving, up until the students start waking up to their own freedom, then classes start to become more lazy, more unproductive, and more meaningless. Adolescents is growing longer and longer with the rise in high school, college, and even graduate school, as it's becoming more and more obvious that people are just occupying their time with busywork. It's becoming clear that their life is simply a long/short wait until their inevitable demise.

There's no surprise that those affected most will either support the most semi-oppresive regimes out there (The democrats), or they'll willfully envision an illusion of a tyrannical movement such as the NWO. Corruption lies everywhere in this world, perhaps more than ever, but because we've been freed from our bondage we've grown indifferent/supportive of it. The Masters have it pretty bad too, they're the ones trying to cater to us for their support; institutions that we used to serve, now exist to serve us. This is typically called "The Enlightenment" however as an idea, it's far from being enlightening. You might think that our freedom causes us to shun their seductions into oblivion, however institutions such as marriage, and religion, government, and even The State continue to exist perhaps stronger than ever, despite being half of their former glory.

Jumping into The Jewish Question

Judaic mythology is arguably one of the first stories told from an oppression narrative. Various Jewish characters are enslaved, or sold into slavery despite being God's chosen people. This is an important distinction, they're not just enslaved, but there's this divine favoritism that keeps them from looking like mere animals. As though they deserve a higher rank, than that which keeps them oppressed.

This mythos has become fully compatible with the oppression narrative of Cultural Marxism. By giving every specific group (typically outsiders that contradict the foundation of that civilization) an oppression narrative, they can fight to make that civilization more accustomed to their lifestyle. This eventually destroys the foundation of that civilization leaving it as a degenerate cesspool.

A basic example of this is the Marxist narrative for black people. Through various ambitious studies of anthropology and history the narrative has been manufactured to make Blacks as the biological foundation of all mankind, not to mention the historical founders of some of the most complex and innovative civilizations of ancient times (ie Egypt). However they have been wrongfully oppressed by slavery, colonialism, jim crow, Apartheid, and the Ku Klux Klan. Some would even go to the extremes of saying that Christianity is oppressive to Blacks. In other words because the Marxist reach on all of academia has established that black people were doing all this awesome shit back in the day, whilst whites were twiddling their thumbs, therefore it's because of white privilege that you're seeing a completely different story today.

Of course for a feminist narrative this story needs a better modification. Civilization has always been patriarchal (unless you count the neanderthals). Therefore the best way to change create an oppression narrative is to assume that behind every dominant reign of power in history a dumb male masquerading as a leader, was being led by an intelligent, seductive, female. No one is safe from this: Napolean, Caesar, Nietzsche, even your dad. While this narrative is disturbing on a freudian level, it's probably the narrative your professor would approve of.

Going into the question of Jews themselves. Yes, you'll find them everywhere that corruption lies; Yes, they managed to amass a large amount of wealth from other civilizations. They are a civilization within a civilization wherever they are, so any nationalistic policy must have a policy for them. It can't be appeasement, yet it can't be something Nazi/WN-esque. Either way the answer to The Jewish Question is yes.