Saturday, January 26, 2013

CM Punk vs The Rock

It's not uncommon for most people to be more invested in Punk vs Rock than they were for Punk vs Cena. With half the build up they managed to get twice the hype based just on their promo on January 7, 2013. There's no doubt in most people's minds that this will lead into Rock winning, and all of this culminating into another Cena vs Rock match at Wrestlemania. I'm not most people, however. I'm much more pessimistic and my optimism always heads to fringier directions.

 Punk has become iconic within the WWE for dropping real talk, yet his new heel angle is nowhere near as layered as his 2009-2011 heel run. His promo on the go home show for Monday Night Raw has him critique the masses and The Rock for representing them. If you know me, there's no room within me for sympathy for the masses, despite this turning Punk into a cowardly heel that cheats his way for the top is too cheap for him.

As for The Rock. This Rock is nowhere near the same character as The Rock from The Attitude Era: Part of what I hate about the pg era is that the wwe fans and audience are now being called a universe, no longer having their own distinct character like ECW, The Attitude Era, or WCW. Instead the WWE has remodeled their audience from being distinctly snarky and energetic to being the idiot masses everyone hates. Every face is now a politician, they certainly speak like one. How different is John Cena and his transformation from The Rock and his transformation as a character. While The Rock certainly was "The People's Champion" that term has taken a new cryptic life of its own.

These are both Talented wrestlers and entertainers who have been given the wrong character roles to play. They need to have a beast match for this Royal Rumble. There's no question about it. The best thing going for this match and feud is that it isn't John Cena vs The Rock. That match was manufactured by Stephanie Mcmahon to be a Team Edward vs Team Jacob wank fantasy. Here there is the vital order of wrestling. You have a face and you have a heel. Someone is trying to get heat in order to get the other guy over. While you could have an excellent feud without an objective good guy or bad guy like the streak matches that Undertaker has it's better for people that are on equal terms. Rock and John Cena were never on equal terms. Similarly to Triple H the WWE has wrongfully given us the facade that Cena is a Hogan/Austin/Rock figure, when in reality he's not.

There's not doubt that the fate of this company lies in the hands of a good road to Wrestlemania, for the WWE is treading dark waters with it's low television ratings and PPV buyrates. The good thing is that the WWE is abandoning Linda's senate campain, however they need to drop their corporate system as it's hurting the company to have to pay their shareholders. This in itself is a tangent, yet it all contributes to the pressures of having this road to Wrestlemania outshine the last one. In the year 2012 the WWE only had one good month, which was the month of April. Here at the very least they need a good season to propel them back to sunshine.

Friday, January 25, 2013

Change and Forward?

In the video "Flyswatting: President Obama" Youtube user Studentofobjectivism has described Barack Obama as a thinker who holds views opposite to the truth. In other words, if your position is the opposite of Barack Obama's position that's an indicator that your position is the correct one. While I'm not an Objectivist by any means I agree with that analysis to a large extent. The problem lies in the fact that in the leftist world truth is layered in entropy. While Barack Obama's Ivy League Marxism and progressivism are inferior to Ayn Rand's Objectivist mode of thought, they both hold narratives that contradict the complex and ordered narrative that has existed in the right wing.

Let me explain what I mean by complex: To be complex is to possess the artifice vital to prevent ourselves from rapidly changing and being melded by the natural world. It's becoming more and more clear that our monogamous breeding patterns, use of marriage and preferences for people that look more like use has slowed our evolution pattern more than other animals, however that loss in entropy has given us a more complex and stable conception of ourselves.

Contrast this with leftist policies that hold on to a narrative that wants us to speed up our evolution to the point of losing this stable and fixed conception of ourselves. Racial integration, Feminism/Marxism, LGBT equality, Ableism and other ideologies mentioned are just a means to an end. At one hand we can assume that the ultimate goal is Anti-Natalism/Efilism which seeks to end all life as a mark to end all suffering, or we can look towards something similar to instrumentality from Neon-Evangelion Genesis where the final stage of evolution is turning all life into a homogeneous ocean of orange semen.

Moving onto the original subject which is Barack Obama, what exactly is the deal with hope, change and forward? Barack Obama has created propaganda via an internet meme, and through Facebook nonetheless (Zuckerberg being another Harvard Ivy League fisher for the degenerates and puppet for Big Brother). All these words are just ways to arouse the masses that rely upon slave morality. Masses have always ultimately depended upon the idea that the future is a higher place, because the tribes and smaller civilizations didn't have this concept died from the depression and loss of hope.

It's come to this: Civilization is so atomized and depressed that people need to rely on an internet meme that the future might be a better place to function as better slaves to an elite that is no longer noble and sovereign, but has now fallen to degeneracy. The geniuses can tell that homogeneity is the long term goal at least in terms of intuition. However the narrative has become so manipulated by the left that our societies very best isn't moving against this movement, but rather actively working for it, or staying in the sideline.

The first thing you should take from all of this is that hope is a good thing. No hope equates to instant death and despair, you could literally fall over dead from a lack of hope, however moving forward and starting a change are completely different concepts. It seems that we should be moving backwards, rather than moving forward, and  instead of changing we should be reverting back to what we once were. Instead of becoming a more intricate and distinct group/nation/etc we are becoming more and more homogeneous and suffering a giant identity crisis because of it. 

So what should you hope for then? That's not a question I have a complete answer for, but you should be able to understand what has a complex, substantial value in your life. Protect it at all costs before it's too late, if it is too late on the other hand, it's best to abandon ship. Not everyone gets things right the first time, but so long as you're still alive you can make things right again. Just try to avoid institutionalized dick cheeses like Barack Obama who don't hold people like you to their best interest. By people like you I mean people that aren't his daughters, nor his wife. Try and think about that for a second.