Edenism is moderately useful for race realists. The fact that blacks have the Homo Erectus gene while non blacks have the neanderthal gene disproves the "Out of Africa" theory. The reason it's only moderately useful is because you can agree with the "Out of Africa" and still be a race-realist; The argument that humans have undergone micro-evolution since the days of Africa is still affective (albeit questionable). For a serious racialist such as myself, Edenism is a useful tool in understanding harder racial narratives. The fact that Aryans started out as hybrids of Cro-Magnon and neanderthal is a pretty useful concept. It explains why whites are so intellectually diverse as a group. It can also explain how a Thal from a Vaisya/Antyaja community can grow up to become a confused Brahmin that hates religion/conservatism for all the wrong reasons.
What it can also explain are some of the faults regarding the black question/The Jewish question. White Jews that make up the elite tend to be Melons, whilst the socially awkward Jewish-kid in your local whole foods couldn't subvert an Ant. Why is this the case? Why is it that we're forced to look up to charismatic plagiarist blacks from the 50's and 60's, yet on the radio all we here is "muh dik"? Racialism is important, yet it has less anthropological dating than some of these archetypes. Politics is a Melon thing. It's a means for the charismatic to rule the docile. This means that removing kebab, bagel, or fried chicken is as easy as neutralizing their Melons. It also means we need to institute some Melon's of our own. Enough with the half-conceived, autistic strategies.
Status quo's are just as easy to remove as they are to maintain. The "Old-White" Anglo-American power structure that gave way to The Judaic power structure; now that political economy is losing relevance something else can replace them.
No comments:
Post a Comment